Martin was employed as a retail associate by UPS for over two years. He had no written employment agreement. On December 5, 2004, Martin's boss called him at his home and told him that he was terminating Martin's employment. The parties disagreed, however, as to the content of the rest of the conversation. Mar- tin testified that his boss had said that he was fired because the other employees felt intimidated by him and that he would give him a severance package of two week's pay if Martin would not litigate. Martin's mother corroborated this version of the conversation. In contrast, Martin's boss stated that he told Martin that he was fired because of his continued use of company computers for personal use and because of the multiple downloads on company computers. The boss claims he indicated that he would give Martin his last week's pay and his November bonus and that he would consider giving him two weeks of severance pay in a few weeks. Martin never received severance pay from the company. The company now argues that the offer of severance pay was not supported by consideration and that Martin was not prejudiced by his boss's rescission of his off er to pay severance. How should the court decide? Why?
Answer to relevant QuestionsIn February 2000, CNS International Ministries, Inc., signed a contract with Eiman Brothers Roofing Systems. Under the contract, Eiman would provide CNS with a clay tile roof for one of its properties. On the basis of the ...How does the concept of the age of majority in Great Britain diff er from that in the United States? Battistella entered into a contract to sell her veterinarian business to Martin. The sales agreement included a covenant not to compete for a period of five years and within a radius of 15 miles. This agreement included a ...Explain the primary differences between duress and undue influence. List the kinds of contracts that require a writing under the statute of frauds.
Post your question