Masters, an antique dealer, promised Shatraw, an international dealer in rare antiques, that if Shatraw could obtain some rare vases from India within three weeks, he would pay Shatraw’s airfare to India to obtain them and, in addition to the cost of the vases, would give him a bonus of $ 1,000. Shatraw did obtain the vases within the three- week period and delivered them to Masters. However, when Shatraw requested his money, Masters claimed that there was no contract because of lack of consideration for the promise he made, and he would not pay Shatraw. Is Masters correct?
Answer to relevant QuestionsTurilli, owner of the Jessie James Museum in Stanton, Missouri, stated that the person shot to death and buried in 1882 as the notorious Jessie James was an imposter and that the real Jessie James lived under the alias of ...This case arises over a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between Fluorogas, a company that manufactures fluorine generators, and Fluorine on Call ( FOC), owned by the Siegele brothers who sought to enter the fluorine ...Discuss the differences among adequate consideration, moral consideration, and past consideration. Pearsall and Alexander drove to a liquor store to purchase lottery tickets. Pearsall went into the store alone, and when he came out, and in reference to the tickets asked Alexander, “ Are you in on it?” Alexander said, ...Williamson, an alcoholic who was threatened with foreclosure on her house, entered into a contract to sell it for $ 17,000. Smith, an attorney who had read about the foreclosure in the newspaper and who knew about ...
Post your question