McDonald’s, a leading fast- food chain of restaurants in the United States, was sued by Arnold Pellman and other teenagers, all New York residents who frequently ate at McDonald’s outlets, contending that they suffered adverse health effects, including becoming overweight as the result of eating McDonald’s food containing high levels of cholesterol, fat, salt, and sugar. They further contended that McDonald’s failed to warn the public of the high quantities of unhealthy ingredients in their products. McDonald’s produced evidence that they made their nutritional information available online and that such information was also available upon request. The plaintiffs ( Pellman and others) failed to show a direct relationship between their eating McDonald’s fast food and the adverse effects on their health. Should Pellman and the other teenagers be successful in their lawsuit against McDonalds?
Answer to relevant QuestionsBalch purchased a dog for $ 800 from Newberry, who operated a kennel. Before the sale, Balch informed Newberry that he wanted a male dog for breeding purposes. Newberry stated that the dog had the ability to produce pups of ...Maritime entered into a contract to purchase a helicopter from Fairchild. Among the relevant provisions typed into the agreement in normal size, in lowercase print on a regular printed form was a clause stating that the sale ...Robinson had purchased a certificate of deposit ( CD) from a bank and had the instrument made payable to him. On its face, the instrument stipulated that if Robinson was deceased at the time the instrument was to be paid, ...Gold signed a promissory note payable to her stepfather as evidence of a loan from him and from her mother. When she did not pay the amount due on the note and her stepfather sued her for the balance due, Gold claimed that ...What is the significance of being an ordinary holder as compared to an HIDC?
Post your question