Michael Manin, an airline pilot, was twice convicted of disorderly conduct, a minor misdemeanor. To renew his flight certification with the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), Manin filed an application that asked him about his criminal history. He did not disclose his two convictions. When these came to light more than ten years later, Manin argued that he had not known that he was required to report convictions for minor misdemeanors. The NTSB’s policy was to con-sider an applicant’s understanding of what information a question sought before determining whether an answer was false. But without explanation, the agency departed from this policy, refused to consider Manin’s argument, and revoked his certification. Was this action arbitrary or capricious? Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsTo ensure highway safety and protect driver health, Congress charged federal agencies with regulating the hours of service of commercial motor vehicle operators. Between 1940 and 2003, the regulations that applied to long- ...Bank of America hired Atlantic Resource Management, LLC, to collect a debt from Michael E. Engler. Atlantic called Engler’s employer and asked his supervisor about the company’s policy concerning the execution of ...1. Should the Court have applied the doctrine of stare decisis to hold that minimum resale price maintenance agreements are still subject to the per se rule? Why or why not?2. What factors might the courts consider in ...What If the Facts Were Different?Suppose that Buckley and the Buckley King firm are held legally liable on all of Lynn’s claims for malpractice. What acts of ethical misconduct might this indicate?The Economic ...On learning that Sébastien planned to travel abroad, Roslyn asked him to deliver $ 25,000 in cash to her family in Mexico. During a customs inspection at the border, Sébastien told the customs inspector that he carried ...
Post your question