Modell owned 80 percent of the Cleveland Stadium Corporation (Stadium) and 53 percent of the Cleveland Browns Football Company (Browns). Gries owned 43 percent of Browns. The Browns’ board consisted of Modell, the outside lawyer for both corporations, three individuals employed by both corporations, and Gries. Modell proposed that the Browns buy the Stadium for $6 million. Gries objected, saying that the Stadium appraised for only $2 million. The Browns’ board, nonetheless, approved the purchase. (All directors other than Gries voted in favor of the purchase.) Gries commenced a shareholders derivative suit seeking to rescind the purchase. Who should win?
Answer to relevant QuestionsThe Patels owned the CC Motel. They formed a partnership with their son, Raj, to own and operate the motel. Title to the motel was not transferred to the partnership. The partnership agreement required Raj to approve the ...f1. Was it unfair to deny athletes the additional $2,500 or so that they could “earn” in the market for their services (playing “major college” football or basketball)? Detail the fairness argument for both the ...The Leegin ruling seems to affirm the Supreme Court’s current preference for free-market principles and reduced judicial intervention in business practice. Accordingly, more competition and better service should follow, ...In 1990, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants agreed to enforce a change in its ethics rules that allowed its members to accept contingent fees and commissions from nonaudit clients. The agreement was the ...1. In your view, does the government, through antitrust law, have a useful, meaningful role to play in regulating high-tech companies such as Apple, Samsung, and Google? Explain. 2. Will the market automatically correct, in ...
Post your question