Multiple Choice Questions:
1. Which of the following is the ultimate item of evidence that is admissible in court?
a. Fraud investigation report pointing to the perpetrator.
b. Video recording of the suspect appearing to commit the fraud.
c. Set of solid, forensic physical evidence.
d. None of the above.

2. An objective of the review of physical and document evidence is to:
a. Become as familiar as possible with the business processes involved.
b. Collect sufficient evidence to legally pursue the perpetrator.
c. Botha and b.
d. None of the above.

3. At the beginning of any investigation, serious consideration should be given to the possibility of catching the fraudster in the act because:
a. Doing so can result in lowering investigation costs.
b. Doing so can provide good evidence for court.
c. Both a and b.
d. None of the above.

4. When should interviews normally be conducted?
a. Before documentary evidence is obtained.
b. After a preliminary draft of the fraud investigation report is ready.
c. Once a suspect can be identified.
d. None of the above.

5. The best approach during interviews is for the investigator to:
a. Be immediately open and let the suspect know at the beginning what evidence exists.
b. Withhold knowledge of evidence for strategic or tactical reasons.
c. Consult with legal counsel to preserve the admissibility of any statements made by the suspect.
d. None of the above.