Now assume that a year passes, and that business does in fact pick up for Harold’s company. He is able to repay the loan in full, with interest. No one is laid off from Harold’s company, no one misses a paycheck, and Harold’s lie is never caught. Is the rating the same with the benefit of hindsight? Do the ends at least partially justify the means?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhat, specifically, makes Operation Fortitude a “better lie” than Harold’s planned course of action? What would you do in the three university examples (decisions 1 through 3)? Why? Assume that after Walters is cut, the Goliaths miss the playoffs. If you had season tickets, would you renew them? As a voting taxpayer, would you be more or less likely to vote in favor of taxpayer dollars being used to ...Some specific kinds of ads cannot be run without certain specific disclosures that run for a specific amount of time. For example, prescription drug ads are required by law to list common side effects. Ads for certain types ...Which two of the five policies did you rank lowest? What specific facts made them more acceptable to you than the others?
Post your question