Oklahoma statutes set the age for drinking 3.2 beer at 21 for men and 18 for women. The asserted purpose behind the statutes (and the sex-based classification that they established) was traffic safety. The statutes were challenged as a denial of equal protection by male residents of Oklahoma. What level of scrutiny would this measure receive if women had been denied the right to drink 3.2 beer until they were 21 but men had been allowed to consume it at age 18? Should this standard change because the measure discriminates against men? Is the male challenge to the statute likely to be successful?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhile it was preparing a comprehensive land use plan in the area, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) imposed two moratoria on development of property in the Lake Tahoe Basin. The moratoria together lasted 32 months. A ...Marigold Dairy Corporation sells milk products, including powdered milk formula for infants. Marigold hopes to increase sales of its powdered milk formula in Liberia and other African nations where mothers are often ...Ahmad Ressam attempted to enter the United States by car ferry at Port Angeles, Washington. Hidden in his rental car's trunk were explosives that he intended to detonate at the Los Angeles International Airport.After the ...A federal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1037, prohibits a variety of misleading electronic mail-related actions in commercial settings. These include instances in which a person who, with knowledge of doing so, "materially falsifies ...While at a Dillard's department store that was located in a shopping mall, Lakesha Millbrook tried on a pair of jeans. She decided not to purchase that pair, but she eventually purchased a different pair and then proceeded ...
Post your question