On June 2, Sibley Co. assigned to the HMCK Bank for $ 70,000 its entire interest in a $ 75,000 account receivable due in sixty days from Farmer. On June 4, HMCK Bank notified Farmer of the assignment. On June 7, Farmer informed HMCK that Sibley Co. had committed fraud in the transaction out of which the account receivable arose and that payment would not be made to HMCK. Should HMCK begin an action against Farmer? If Farmer is able to prove Sibley Co. acted in a fraudulent manner, can he successfully assert fraud as a defense?
Answer to relevant QuestionsOn June 10, The First Bank of Georgia lent RYCOM Construction Company $ 50,000. RYCOM assigned its right to receive $ 30,000 due for work performed for Marlan, a contractor. It also assigned its right to receive $ 20,000 ...Smith owned several condominiums that he offered for sale. Each purchaser was required under the terms of Smith’s contract to assume the responsibility to pay, among other things, taxes. Smith assigned ( sold) his interest ...Vance, a peanut grower, entered into an agreement to provide 2,000 pounds of peanuts to Timmons, a peanut processor. Severe rains, however, caused flooding and destroyed the peanut crop to be supplied by Vance. Vance argued ...Sugarhouse sued Anderson for nonpayment of a promissory note and obtained a judgment against him for $ 2,423.86. For two years, Anderson had financial difficulties and couldn’t pay the judgment. When he learned that he ...What kind of restriction is placed on a person who is entitled to compensatory damages?
Post your question