Once the government decided to intervene in the free market on behalf of consumers, two broad product safety options presented themselves: (a) the government could have limited its effort to generating and distributing information to consumers, or (b) the government could have set safety standards for all products. Assuming the government was forced to choose one or the other but not elements of both, which option should it have chosen? Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsConsumers sometimes abuse sellers. One familiar technique is shoplifting. Of course, shoplifting is a crime. However, the criminal process is cumbersome and often does not result in monetary recoveries for sellers. As a ...Phusion Projects was accused by the Federal Trade Commission of mislabeling its flavored malt drink Four Loko. The FTC investigated the company’s implied claims that consumers could safely drink one 23.5-ounce can at a ...1. Who in the United States is hurt by the tariffs described above? Who in the United States is advantaged by them? 2. Why might U.S. tariffs be friendlier to French products than Cambodian goods? In addition to the fact ...1. Why did the court hold that Vance, a U.S. corporation, could avoid Butters’s claim of discrimination based on a claim of sovereign immunity? Why did Butters argue that sovereign immunity should not apply? 2. How do you ...Should a Mexican citizen who bought a Chrysler vehicle in Mexico be allowed to sue the manufacturer in a U.S. court under U.S. product liability laws when the plaintiff’s three-year-old son was killed when the ...
Post your question