One potential criticism of the net present value technique is that there is an implicit assumption that this technique assumes the intermediate cash flows of the project are reinvested at the required return. In other words, if you calculate the future value of the intermediate cash flows to the end of the project at the required return, sum the future values, and find the net present value of the two cash flows, you will get the same net present value as the original calculation. If the reinvestment rate used to calculate the future value is lower than the required return, the net present value will decrease. How would you evaluate this criticism?
Answer to relevant QuestionsOne potential criticism of the internal rate of return technique is that there is an implicit assumption that this technique assumes the intermediate cash flows of the project are reinvested at the internal rate of return. ...eGolf, Inc., has the following mutually exclusive projects. a. Suppose eGolf’s payback period cutoff is two years. Which of these two projects should be chosen? b. Suppose eGolf uses the NPV rule to rank these two ...Pixie Group, a consumer electronics conglomerate, is reviewing its annual budget in wireless technology. It is considering investments in three different technologies to develop wireless communication devices. Consider the ...The Yurdone Corporation wants to set up a private cemetery business. According to the CFO, Barry M. Deep, business is “looking up.” As a result, the cemetery project will provide a net cash in flow of $52,000 for the ...Who Dat Restaurant is considering the purchase of a $39,000 souffle maker. The souffle maker has an economic life of six years and will be fully depreciated by the straight-line method. The machine will produce 2,500 ...
Post your question