# Question: Part 1 Even after the recent public experiment about cereal

Part 1 Even after the recent public experiment about cereal box weights, Consumers Concerned About Cereal Cheaters (CCACC) remains convinced that Oxford Cereals has misled the public. The group has created and circulated More Cheating. pdf, a document in which it claims that ce-real boxes produced at Plant Number 2 in Springville weigh less than the claimed mean of 368 grams. Review this document and then answer the following questions:

1. Do the CCACC’s results prove that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean weights of cereal boxes produced at Plant Numbers 1 and 2?

2. Perform the appropriate analysis to test the CCACC’s hypothesis. What conclusions can you reach based on the data?

Part 2 Apply your knowledge about ANOVA in this part, which continues the cereal- fill packaging dispute Digital Case. After reviewing the CCACC’s MoreCheating.pdf document, Oxford Cereals has released SecondAnalysis.pdf, a press kit that Oxford Cereals has assembled to refute the claim that it is guilty of using selective data. Review the Oxford Cereals press kit and then answer the following questions.

3. Does Oxford Cereals have a legitimate argument? Why or why not?

4. Assuming that the samples Oxford Cereals has posted were randomly selected, perform the appropriate analysis to resolve the ongoing weight dispute.

5. What conclusions can you reach from your results? If you were called as an expert witness, would you sup-port the claims of the CCACC or the claims of Oxford Cereals? Explain.

1. Do the CCACC’s results prove that there is a statistically significant difference in the mean weights of cereal boxes produced at Plant Numbers 1 and 2?

2. Perform the appropriate analysis to test the CCACC’s hypothesis. What conclusions can you reach based on the data?

Part 2 Apply your knowledge about ANOVA in this part, which continues the cereal- fill packaging dispute Digital Case. After reviewing the CCACC’s MoreCheating.pdf document, Oxford Cereals has released SecondAnalysis.pdf, a press kit that Oxford Cereals has assembled to refute the claim that it is guilty of using selective data. Review the Oxford Cereals press kit and then answer the following questions.

3. Does Oxford Cereals have a legitimate argument? Why or why not?

4. Assuming that the samples Oxford Cereals has posted were randomly selected, perform the appropriate analysis to resolve the ongoing weight dispute.

5. What conclusions can you reach from your results? If you were called as an expert witness, would you sup-port the claims of the CCACC or the claims of Oxford Cereals? Explain.

## Answer to relevant Questions

Open Oxford Current News. pdf, a portfolio of current news releases from Oxford Cereals. Review the relevant press releases and supporting documents. Then answer the following questions: 1. Are the results of the experiment ...Open MTL_ QRTStudy. pdf, which documents the work of a quality response team at MyTVLab. Read the internal report that documents the work of the team and their conclusions. Then answer the following: 1. Can the collected ...The following data were collected on the number of nonconformities per unit for 10 time periods: a. Construct the appropriate control chart and determine the LCL and UCL. b. Are there any special causes of variation? The following data were collected on nonconformances for a period of 10 days: a. On what day is the proportion of nonconformances largest? Smallest? b. What are the LCL and UCL? c. Are there any special causes of ...A manufacturing company makes brackets for bookshelves. The brackets provide critical structural support and must have a 90 degree bend ± 1 degree. Measurements of the bend of the brackets were taken at 18 different times. ...Post your question