Plaintiffs Dr. Arthur Weisz and David and Irene Schwartz bought two paintings at auctions conducted by Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. The paintings were listed in the auction catalog as those of Raoul Dufy. It was later discovered that the paintings were forgeries. The plaintiffs took legal action to recover their losses. Parke-Bernet defended itself by, among other arguments, asserting that the conditions of sale included a disclaimer providing that all properties were sold “as is.” The conditions of sale were 15 numbered paragraphs embracing several pages in the auction catalog. The bulk of the auction catalog was devoted to descriptions of the works of art to be sold, including artists’ names, dates of birth and death, and, in some instances, black-and-white reproductions of the paintings. It was established at trial that plaintiff Weisz had not previously entered bids at Parke-Bernet, and he had no awareness of the conditions of sale. Plaintiffs David and Irene Schwartz, however, were generally aware of the conditions of sale. Is the Parke-Bernet disclaimer legally binding on the plaintiffs? Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsA bipartisan coalition labeled “Mayors Against Illegal Guns” released a 2010 study finding that 43,000 of the guns confiscated at crimes scenes in 2009 came from out-of-state gun dealers. Georgia, Virginia, West ...At this writing in 2013, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), the primary governing body for college athletics, is in the midst of a heated debate about proposals for deregulating NCAA oversight practices. A ...1. In your judgment, does the Commerce Clause afford the federal government the authority to regulate a local business like the Heart of Atlanta motel? Explain. 2. Should the federal government regulate local business to ...1. In 2014, New York state’s highest court declined to reinstate the soda ban. Would you approve of a nationwide soda ban? Explain. 2. a. New Republic senior editor timothy Noah: “Even as liberals and conservatives ...Joseph Stiglitz, the chief White House economist at the time, argued in 1996 that “a huge economic literature” supports his view that “appropriately circumscribed government programs can lead to a higher-growth ...
Post your question