Question: Point for Discussion Simon has no evidence that the truck
Point for Discussion: Simon has no evidence that the truck contained anything legally owned by the megabank. He only has the statements of the old man and the note and cash. Should he report the details of the incident to the attorney? Should the attorney report the apparently missing inventory to the authorities as a theft? What are the things the paralegal and attorney should consider in making these decisions?
Answer to relevant QuestionsWhy is the attorney responsible for not discovering Henry’s errors if there is clear evidence that she trusted him because he had demonstrated years of exceptional work performance? Why are ethical codes in place for attorneys and paralegals? Point for Discussion: Because the tickets were purchased online from a private individual, rather than the original ticket outlet, should the classmate have a responsibility to assess the validity of the tickets? How have workers’ compensation laws affected tort actions? Are antenuptial agreements legally enforceable?
Post your question