need answers for 3 questions asap

Project Description:

1. in 1945, a deed for land in pitt county, north carolina, was executed and delivered by joel and louisa tyson “unto m.h. jackson and wife maggie jackson, for an during the term of their natural lives and after their death to the children of the said m.h. jackson and maggie jackson that shall be born to their intermarriage as shall survive them to them and their heirs and assigns in fee simple forever.” thelma jackson vester, a daughter of m.h. and maggie jackson, died in 1997, survived by three children. m.h. jackson, who survived his wife, maggie jackson, died in 1998, survived by four sons. the children of thelma jackson vester brought this action against m.p. jackson, a son of and executor of the will of m.h. jackson. the children of vester contended that through their deceased mother they were entitled to a one-fifth interest in the land conveyed by the deed of 1945. the executor contended that the deed conveyed a contingent remainder and that only those children who survived the parents took an interest in the land. decision? please discuss.


2. robert and marjorie wake owned land that they used as both a cattle ranch and a farm. each spring and autumn, the wakes would drive their cattle from the ranch portion of the operation across an access road on the farmland to butler springs, which was also on the farmland. in december 1976, the wakes sold the farm to jesse and maud hess but retained for themselves a right-of-way over the farm access road and the right to use butler springs for watering their livestock. in 1983, the hesses sold the farm to the johnsons, granting them uninterrupted possession of the property “excepting only that permissive use of the premises” owned by the wakes.


the wakes continued to use the access road and butler springs until 1984, when they sold their ranch and granted the new owners “their rights to the water of butler springs.” but they said nothing about the access road. the ranch was subsequently sold several times, and all the owners used the access road and watering hole. in 1998, the nelsons purchased the ranch. shortly thereafter, the johnsons notified the nelsons that they had revoked the nelson’s right to use the access road and butler springs. in 1999, the johnsons closed the access road by locking the gates across the road. the nelsons brought this action claiming easements to both the access road and butler springs. the trial court ruled in favor of the nelsons, and the johnsons appealed. what is your decision? please discuss.


3. temco, inc., conveyed to the wynns certain property adjoining an apartment complex being developed by sonnett realty company. although nothing to this effect was contained in the deed, the sales contract gave the purchaser of the property use of the apartment’s swimming pool. temco’s sales agent also emphasized that use of the pool would be a desirable feature in the event that the wynns decided to sell the property.


seven years later, the bunns contracted to buy the property from the wynns through the latter’s agent, sonnett realty. although both the wynns and sonnett realty’s agent told the bunns that use of the apartment’s pool went with the purchased property, neither the contract nor the deed subsequently conveyed to the bunns so provided. when the bunns requested pool passes from temco and offutt, the company that owned the apartments, their request was refused. the bunns then brought this action. decision? please discuss.
Skills Required:
Project Stats:

Price Type: Negotiable

Expired
Total Proposals: 3
1 Current viewersl
17 Total views
Project posted by:

Proposals

Proposals Reputation Price offered