project management

Project Description:

crosby manufacturing corporation read the chapter 12 case: crosby manufacturing corporation. prepare a three to six (3-6) page report that answers the following: compose a synopsis of the case, using a maximum of 120 words. crosby manufacturing corporation's president, livingston, appointed tim emary to be project manager over the management cost and control system project. while emary is a capable planner, he is not from either the formal project management group or the edp department, functional departments from which project managers usually come. discuss whether or not livingston's selection of emary as project manager was a mistake. discuss the possible reaction of the functional employees to the appointment of emary as project manager. discuss the impact of cost and time constraints on networking techniques and project schedules. discuss which constraints ultimately compromise the project's performance quality. the format of the report is to be as follows: typed, double spaced, times new roman font (size 12), one inch margins on all sides (apa format). use headers for each of the criteria, followed by your response. in addition to the three to six (3-6) pages required, a title page is to be included. the title page is to contain the title of the task, your name, the instructor's name, the course title, and the date. note: you will be graded on the quality of your answers, the logic/organization of the report, your language skills, and your writing skills. the task will be graded using the following rubric: outcomes assessed create cost control procedures. use technology and information resources to research issues in project management. grading rubric for task 2 - crosby manufacturing corporation criteria 0 unacceptable 20 developing 30 competent 40 exemplary 1. compose a synopsis of the case. did not complete the task or did not compose a synopsis of the case; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. completed with less than 60% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. partially composed a synopsis of the case; omitted some key information. completed with 60-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. sufficiently composed a synopsis of the case. completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. fully composed a synopsis of the case. completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. 2. discuss whether livingston's selection of emary as project manager was a mistake. did not complete the task or did not discuss whether livingston's selection of emary as project manager was a mistake; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. completed with less than 60% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. partially discussed whether livingston's selection of emary as project manager was a mistake; omitted some key information. completed with 60-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. sufficiently discussed whether livingston's selection of emary as project manager was a mistake. completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. fully discussed whether livingston's selection of emary as project manager was a mistake. completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. 3. discuss the possible reaction of the functional employees to the appointment of emary as project manager. did not complete the task or did not discuss the possible reaction of the functional employees to the appointment of emary as project manager; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. completed with less than 60% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. partially discussed the possible reaction of the functional employees to the appointment of emary as project manager; omitted some key information. completed with 60-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. sufficiently discussed the possible reaction of the functional employees to the appointment of emary as project manager. completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. fully discussed the possible reaction of the functional employees to the appointment of emary as project manager. completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. 4. discuss the impact of cost and time constraints on networking techniques and project schedules. did not complete the task or did not discuss the impact of cost and time constraints on networking techniques and project schedules; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. completed with less than 60% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. partially discussed the impact of cost and time constraints on networking techniques and project schedules; omitted some key information. completed with 60-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. sufficiently discussed the impact of cost and time constraints on networking techniques and project schedules. completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. fully discussed the impact of cost and time constraints on networking techniques and project schedules. completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. 5. discuss which constraints ultimately compromised the project's performance quality. did not complete the task or did not discuss which constraints ultimately compromised the project's performance quality; omitted key information and/or included irrelevant information. completed with less than 60% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. partially discussed which constraints ultimately compromised the project's performance quality; omitted some key information. completed with 60-79% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. sufficiently discussed which constraints ultimately compromised the project's performance quality. completed with 80-89% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. fully discussed which constraints ultimately compromised the project's performance quality. completed with 90-100% accuracy, thoroughness, and logic. 6. clarity did not complete the task or explanations are unclear and not organized. (major issues) explanations generally unclear and not well organized. (many issues) explanations generally clear and/or organized. (minor issues) explanations very clear and well organized. (added helpful details.) 7. writing, grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, apa usage. did not complete the task or had 8 or more different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or apa usage. (major issues) had 6 - 7 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or apa usage. (many issues) had 4 - 5 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or apa usage. (minor issues) had 0 - 3 different errors in grammar, sentence structure, paragraph structure, spelling, punctuation, or apa usage.
Skills Required:
Project Stats:

Price Type: Negotiable

Completed
Total Proposals: 2
1 Current viewersl
11 Total views
Project posted by:

Proposals

Proposals Reputation Price offered
  • 4.6
    16 Jobs 9 Reviews
    $0 in 0 Day
  • 3.5
    2 Jobs 2 Reviews
    $30 in 0 Day