# Question

Rather than stop the production when a mean crosses the control limits in the X-bar chart, a manager has decided to wait until two consecutive means lie outside the control limits before stopping the process. The control limits are at μ ± 2σ / √n.

(a) By waiting for two consecutive sample means to lie outside the control limits, has the manager increased or decreased the chance for a Type I error?

(b) What is the probability of a Type I error if this procedure is used?

(a) By waiting for two consecutive sample means to lie outside the control limits, has the manager increased or decreased the chance for a Type I error?

(b) What is the probability of a Type I error if this procedure is used?

## Answer to relevant Questions

Suppose that a manager monitors both the X-bar and S-charts. The manager will stop the process if either a sample mean lies outside the control limits or a sample standard deviation lies outside the control limits. The ...Auto manufacturers buy car components from suppliers who deliver them to the assembly line. A manufacturer can schedule staff time to check a sample of 5 parts a day for defects or a sample of 25 parts over the weekend when ...Most commercial Internet sites monitor site traffic so that they can recognize attacks by hackers, such as a distributed denial of service attack (DDoS). In this attack, the hacker hijacks a collection of the computers ...Convert these confidence intervals. (a) [11 pounds to 45 pounds] to kilograms [1 pound = 0.453 kilogram] (b) [$2,300 to $4,400] to yen (Use the exchange rate of $1= ¥ 116.3.) (c) [$79.50 to $101.44] minus a fixed cost of ...Find the appropriate percentile from a t-distribution for constructing the following confidence intervals: (a) 90% t-interval with n = 12 (b) 95% t-interval with n = 6 (c) 99% t-interval with n = 15Post your question

0