# Question: Refer to Exercise 18 30 In Exercise 18 30 The following data are from

Refer to Exercise 18.30.

In Exercise 18.30

The following data are from Gennings, Chinchilli, and Carter, (1989). An in vitro toxicity study of isolated hepatocyte suspensions was conducted to study the impact of combining carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and chloroform (CHCl3) on the toxicity of cells. Cell toxicity was measured by the amount oflactic dehydrogenase (LDH) enzyme leakage. The study involved randomly assigning four flasks to each of the 16 treatments obtained by combining four levels of CCl4 (0, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 mM) with four levels of CHCl3 (0, 5, 10, and 25 mM). The percentage of LDH leakage from the cells in each of the 64 flasks was measured just prior to applying the treatment to the flasks and at .01, .25, .5, 1, 2, and 3 hours after applying the treatment. The percentages of LDH leakage are given in the following table.

a. Run a repeated measures analysis of variance, and determine if there are significant interaction and/or main effects due to CCl4 and CHCl3. Is there a significant time effect?

b. Do the conditions necessary for using a split-plot analysis of repeated measures data appear to be valid?

In Exercise 18.30

The following data are from Gennings, Chinchilli, and Carter, (1989). An in vitro toxicity study of isolated hepatocyte suspensions was conducted to study the impact of combining carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and chloroform (CHCl3) on the toxicity of cells. Cell toxicity was measured by the amount oflactic dehydrogenase (LDH) enzyme leakage. The study involved randomly assigning four flasks to each of the 16 treatments obtained by combining four levels of CCl4 (0, 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 mM) with four levels of CHCl3 (0, 5, 10, and 25 mM). The percentage of LDH leakage from the cells in each of the 64 flasks was measured just prior to applying the treatment to the flasks and at .01, .25, .5, 1, 2, and 3 hours after applying the treatment. The percentages of LDH leakage are given in the following table.

a. Run a repeated measures analysis of variance, and determine if there are significant interaction and/or main effects due to CCl4 and CHCl3. Is there a significant time effect?

b. Do the conditions necessary for using a split-plot analysis of repeated measures data appear to be valid?

**View Solution:**## Answer to relevant Questions

Refer to Exercise 18.30. Consider as your response variable the proportional change in the mean percentage of leakage at time 3 hours and at time 0. That is, y = P3 – P0/P0 where P0 and P3 are the percentage of leakage ...Refer to Exercise 18.36. In Exercise 18.36 Sodium nitrate, a preservative that is used in some processed meats, such as bacon, jerky, and luncheon meats, could increase your heart disease risk. A consumer protection ...Refer to Exercise 18.4. In Exercise 18.4 A meat science researcher designed a study to investigate the impact of increasing the portion of grain (and hence decreasing the portion of hay) in the daily ration for cattle on the ...Refer to Exercise 19.11. Use the Tukey-Kramer W to identify which pairs of varieties have significantly different mean marketable yields. In Exercise 19.11 A horticulturist is interested in examining A horticulturist is ...A petroleum company was interested in comparing the miles per gallon achieved by four different gasoline blends (I, II, III, and IV). Because there can be considerable variability due to differences in drivers and car ...Post your question