# Question: Refer to the previous exercise The analysis there did not

Refer to the previous exercise. The analysis there did not take into account the size of the change in blood pressure. Show how to do this with the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test.

a. State the hypotheses for that test, for the relevant one-sided alternative hypothesis.

b. Construct the sampling distribution for the rank sum of the positive differences when you consider the possible samples that have absolute differences in blood pressure of 20, 25, and 15.

c. Using the sampling distribution from part b, find and interpret the P-value. (When every difference is positive, or when every difference is negative, this test and the sign test give the same P-value, for a given alternative hypothesis.)

a. State the hypotheses for that test, for the relevant one-sided alternative hypothesis.

b. Construct the sampling distribution for the rank sum of the positive differences when you consider the possible samples that have absolute differences in blood pressure of 20, 25, and 15.

c. Using the sampling distribution from part b, find and interpret the P-value. (When every difference is positive, or when every difference is negative, this test and the sign test give the same P-value, for a given alternative hypothesis.)

**View Solution:**## Answer to relevant Questions

The figure shown is a graph published by Statistics Sweden. It compares Swedish society in 1750 and in 2010 on the numbers of men and women of various ages, using “age pyramids.” Explain how this indicates that a. In ...Refer to Exercise 15.11. That analysis did not take into account the magnitudes of the differences in reaction times. Show how to do this with the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test, illustrating by using only the four observations ...Refer to the previous exercise. For the actual experiment, suppose the participants using the tanning studio got ranks 1 and 2 and the participants using the tanning lotion got ranks 3 and 4. a. Find and interpret the ...In Exercise 15.12 on the effect of a GRE training workshop on the writing you used the sign test to evaluate the test differences of 0.5, -0.5, and 1.5. Suppose the test differences were 5.5, -0.5, and 1.5 instead of 0.5, ...Refer to the previous exercise. For these data, MINITAB reports Point estimate for ETA1-ETA2 is -2.000. 95.9 Percent CI for ETA1-ETA2 is (-3.300, -0.700). W = 31.0. Explain how to interpret the reported (a) Point estimate ...Post your question