Rework Exercise 9.4 using the standardized CUSUM parameters of h = 8.01 and k = 0.25. Compare the results with those obtained previously in Exercise 9.4. What can you say about the theoretical performance of those two CUSUM schemes?
Answer to relevant QuestionsReconsider the data in Exercise 9.4. Suppose the data there represent observations taken immediately after a process adjustment that was intended to reset the process to a target of µ0 = 8.00. Set up and apply an FIR CUSUM ...A manufacturing process operates with an in-control fraction of nonconforming production of at most 0.1%, which management is willing to accept 95% of the time; however, if the fraction nonconforming increases to 2% or more, ...Consider the molecular weight data in Exercise 10.16. Construct a CUSUM control chart on the residuals from the model you fit to the data in part (c) of that exercise. Let 0 = 0, = 1 sigma, k = 0.5, h = 5. In Exercise ...The data shown in Table 10E.10 are temperature measurements made every 2 minutes on an intermediate chemical product (read down, then across from left to right). (a) Calculate the sample autocorrelation function. Interpret ...Consider the cost information given in exercise 10.30. Suppose that the process model represented by equation 10.31 is appropriate. It requires 2 h to investigate a false alarm, the profit per hour of operating in the ...
Post your question