Richard H. Pettingell and Joseph A. Regan withdrew as partners from the Boston law fi rm of Morrison, Mahoney, & Miller. They brought an action to receive funds that they believed were due to them for voluntarily withdrawing from the firm. Pettingell and Regan left the partnership to establish a new, competing firm. The partnership agreement states that if a partner voluntarily withdraws from the firm and "engages in any activities which are in competition with the then-current activities of the firm, he shall forfeit all of the benefits" that would be received if the employee were to voluntarily withdraw. There was no evidence to indicate that the establishment of the new firm had seriously affected the original firm. Pettingell and Regan disagreed with the forfeiture provision of the partnership agreement. How do you think the court decided?
Answer to relevant QuestionsAfter the dissolution of a partnership formed to develop the Four Seasons Resort, TSA International Limited brought an action against Shimizu Corporation alleging breach of fiduciary duty. TSA had approached Shimizu in 1986 ...Larry Buhman opened an upscale cigar shop called "The Smoke Ring." Buhman became dissatisfied with his partner's performance and decided to terminate the relationship. James McGaughy, who previously had been working ...Compare and contrast common stock and preferred stock. Investors brought a class action lawsuit against man- agers of a corporation, claiming that the managers made misleading statements that caused them to over- pay for the corporation's stocks. An expert concluded that the ...What is the current amount of the federal minimum wage? When was the last time the federal minimum wage was increased?
Post your question