RKR Dance Studios hired Jessica Makowski as an at-will employee. At that time, Makowski signed a noncompete agreement. In 2006, Makowski signed a new noncompete, allegedly in consideration for new training programs provided by RKR. The 2006 agreement provided that Makowski would not, for a period of two years after leaving RKR’s employ, work as a dance instructor or provide dance lessons in the employ of a competitor within 15 miles or within 10 miles of certain dance studios. As a result, the covenant appeared to include all dance studios nationally. In 2007, Makowski left the employ of RKR and went to work for a competitor. When RKR attempted to enforce the noncompete clause, Makowski argued that it was unenforceable. How should the court rule on this claim?