Scampoli, a merchant, sold and delivered a new TV set to Wilson. When Wilson discovered that the set did not work properly, he asked Scampoli to correct the problem. Scampoli’s repairperson, however, could not fix the set at Wilson’s house and stated that the TV set would have to be taken back to the store and dismantled to determine the cause of the problem. Wilson refused to let the set go; instead, he demanded that Scampoli deliver a new TV or else refund his money. Scampoli said no to the refund and insisted that he be given the opportunity to correct the problem with the TV before returning the purchase price. Does Scampoli have the right to attempt to cure the problem?
Answer to relevant QuestionsSupronics Corp., a manufacturer of ordinary types of lipsticks and nail polish, agreed to sell Hillmor Sales a small quantity of nail polish and lipsticks at close- out prices. Supronics then “pulled” the order so as to ...How do you determine whether a statement made by a seller to a consumer is an express warranty or mere sales puffing? In order for a consumer to successfully sue and win her case against a seller (e. g., a manufacturer) for injury under the theory of strict liability, what proof must be introduced in court? Maritime entered into a contract to purchase a helicopter from Fairchild. Among the relevant provisions typed into the agreement in normal size, in lowercase print on a regular printed form was a clause stating that the sale ...Regardless of the limiting features of a qualified indorsement, an instrument with this indorsement can still be negotiated because it can be combined with any other type of indorsement. What happens when you combine a blank ...
Post your question