Seligman, Nolen-Hecksema, Thornton, and Thornton (1990) classified participants in their study (who were members of a university swim team) as Optimists or Pessimists. They then asked them to swim their best event, and in each case they reported times that were longer than the swimmer actually earned, disappointing everyone. Half an hour later they asked them to repeat the event again. The dependent variable was Time1/Time2, so a ratio greater than 1.0 indicates faster times on the second trial. The data follow:
Calculate the mean for each group. Seligman et al. thought that optimists would try harder after being disappointed. Does it look as if they were correct?
Answer to relevant QuestionsIn Exercise 4.22 women did not show much difference between Optimists and Pessimists. The first 17 scores in the Optimist group are for men and the first 13 scores in the Pessimist group are for men. What do you find for ...Given the following set of data, demonstrate that subtracting a constant (e.g., 5) from every score reduces all measures of central tendency by that amount. Using the data for ENGG in Appendix D perform the following: (a) Calculate the variance and the standard deviation for ENGG. (b) These measures should be greater than the corresponding measures on GPA. Can you explain why ...Everitt, as reported in Hand, Daly, Lunn, McConway, and Oserowski (1994), presented data on the amount of weight gained by 72 anorexic girls under one of three treatment conditions. The conditions were Cognitive Behavior ...Using what you have learned from Exercises 5.6 and 5.7, transform the following set of data to a new set with a standard deviation of 1.00.
Post your question