Smith Services, Inc., a trucking business owned by Tony Smith, charged its fuel purchases to an account at Laker Express. When Smith Services was not paid on several contracts, it ceased doing business and was dissolved. Smith continued to provide trucking services, however, as a sole proprietor. Laker Express sought to recover Smith Services’ unpaid fuel charges, which amounted to about $ 35,000, from Smith. He argued that he was not personally liable for a corporate debt. Should the court pierce the corporate veil? Explain.
Answer to relevant QuestionsMark Burnett and Kamran Pourgol were the only shareholders in a corporation that built and sold a house. When the buyers discovered that the house exceeded the amount of square footage allowed by the building permit, Pourgol ...The Ethical DimensionIf this case proceeds to trial, how might the directors try to defend their decisions? What rule concerning director liability might protect them? Explain your answer. The Legal Environment DimensionCan ...General Star Indemnity Co. agreed to insure Indianapolis Racing League race cars against damage during on-track accidents. General Star deposited $ 400,000 with G Force, LLC (GFCO), a Colorado firm, to enable it to buy and ...Karel Svoboda, a credit officer for Rogue Bank, evaluated and approved his employer’s extensions of credit to clients. These responsibilities gave Svoboda access to nonpublic information about the clients’ earnings, ...The Ethical DimensionSuppose that the defendant automaker had opposed this action solely to avoid paying for a car that had proved to be a “lemon.” Would this have been unethical? Explain.The Legal Environment ...
Post your question