Some have argued that throwing darts at the stock pages to decide which companies to invest in could be a successful stock-picking strategy. Suppose a researcher decides to test this theory and randomly chooses 100 companies to invest in. After 1 year, 53 of the companies were considered winners; that is, they outperformed other companies in the same investment class. To assess whether the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners, the researcher tested H0: p = 0.5 versus H1: p > 0.5 and obtained a P-value of 0.2743. Explain what this P-value means and write a conclusion for the researcher.
Answer to relevant QuestionsSuppose an acquaintance claims to have the ability to determine the birth month of randomly selected individuals. To test such a claim, you randomly select 80 individuals and ask the acquaintance to state the birth month of ...In August 2003, 56% of employed adults in the United States reported that basic mathematical skills were critical or very important to their job. The supervisor of the job placement ofﬁce at a 4-year college thinks this ...According to a survey conducted by the Association for Dressings and Sauces (this is an actual association!), 85% of American adults eat salad at least once a week. A nutritionist suspects that the percentage is higher than ...According to the Centers for Disease Control, in 2008, 21% of adult Americans age 18 or older were current smokers. Treat the results of the Sullivan Statistics Survey as a random sample of adult Americans. Do the survey ...Suppose we are testing the hypothesis H0: p = 0.3 versus H1: p > 0.3 and we ﬁnd the P-value to be 0.23. Explain what this means. Would you reject the null hypothesis? Why?
Post your question