Question: Some researchers have argued that strategic alliances are one way
Some researchers have argued that strategic alliances are one way in which firms can help facilitate the development of a tacit collusion strategy. In your view, what are the critical differences between tacit collusion strategies and strategic alliance strategies?
Answer to relevant QuestionsIf the order of analyses is important, which should come first: external analysis or internal analysis?How can one tell whether two firms are engaging in an alliance to facilitate collusion or are engaging in an alliance for other purposes?Which of the following firms faces the greater threat of “cheating” in the alliances described, and why?a. Firms I and II form a strategic alliance. As part of the alliance, Firm I agrees to build a new plant right next ...It has been shown that so-called “poison pills” rarely prevent a takeover from occurring. In fact, sometimes when a firm announces that it is instituting a poison pill, its stock price goes up. Why?How are the organizational options for implementing an international strategy related to the M-form structure described in Chapter 8? Are these international organizational options just special cases of the M-form structure, ...
Post your question