In 1975, Carlos Cordova and several other investors founded Capital National Bank (CNB) in Bronx, New York.1

Question:

In 1975, Carlos Cordova and several other investors founded Capital National Bank (CNB) in Bronx, New York.1 Cordova was appointed the bank’s chief executive officer (CEO) and chairman of the board. Over the next several years, the bank opened five branch offices in the New York City metropolitan area. CNB catered primarily to the banking needs of Hispanic-American and immigrant communities in New York City. In 1986, Cordova and the other owners of CNB formed CapitalBanc Corporation, a publicly owned bank holding company registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Throughout its entire existence, the principal operating entity controlled by CapitalBanc was CNB. Cordova assumed the titles of president, CEO, and chairman of the board of the new bank holding company.

In the fall of 1987, CapitalBanc retained Arthur Andersen & Co. as its independent audit fi rm. Andersen’s first engagement for CapitalBanc was to audit the bank holding company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1987. Thomas Curtin, an Arthur Andersen partner since 1979, served as the engagement partner for the 1987 CapitalBanc audit. Curtin delegated the responsibility for much of the audit planning to James Lukenda, an audit manager with Arthur Andersen since 1983. Lukenda also supervised the staff auditors assigned to the CapitalBanc engagement.

On December 29, 1987, several Arthur Andersen staff auditors accompanied members of CNB’s internal audit staff to the bank’s 177th Street Branch. The Arthur Andersen auditors intended to observe and participate in a surprise count of the branch’s cash funds by the internal auditors. Related audit objectives included testing CNB’s compliance with certain control procedures and evaluating the competence of the bank’s internal audit staff. The accounting personnel at each CNB branch maintained a “vault general ledger proof sheet” that reconciled the cash on hand to the balance of the branch’s general ledger cash account. During the surprise cash count at the 177th Street Branch, the Arthur Andersen auditors discovered a \($2.7\) million reconciling item listed on the branch’s proof sheet. That amount equaled 61 percent of the branch’s general ledger cash balance and 45 percent of the branch’s total cash funds that were supposed to be available on the date of the surprise count. When the staff auditors asked to count the \($2.7\) million of cash represented by the reconciling item, bank employees told them that Cordova had segregated those funds in a locked cabinet within the bank’s main vault. Three keys were required to unlock the cabinet. Cordova, who was out of the country at the time, maintained custody of one of those keys.

Stymied temporarily, one of the staff auditors telephoned Lukenda. The staff auditor relayed to Lukenda the information regarding the \($2.7\) million of segregated cash. After considering the matter and discussing it with Curtin, Lukenda instructed the staff auditor to count the cash upon Cordova’s return. Lukenda also reportedly told the staff auditor that it would not be necessary to place audit seals on the doors of the cabinet or to secure it in any other way given the three-key security system used by the branch. Following the telephone conversation with Lukenda, the staff auditor advised bank personnel that Arthur Andersen auditors would count the cash on the date Cordova returned from his trip. CNB’s practice of segregating a large amount of cash in the locked cabinet was clearly not a normal banking procedure. In a subsequent investigation, the SEC commented on this practice: 

It is an unusual circumstance for a substantial portion of a bank’s cash to be inaccessible for an extended period of time. It is also unusual for a substantial portion of a bank’s assets not to be invested and earning interest for an extended period of time. 

In early January 1988, an employee of the 177th Street Branch notified Arthur Andersen that Cordova would return on January 14. On that date, the Arthur Andersen staff auditors arrived at the branch to complete their count of the cash funds. Cordova opened the locked cabinet in the main vault in the presence of the staff auditors. The auditors then proceeded to count the \($2.7\) million that had not been counted on December 29, 1987. All of the cash was present. None of the other cash funds of the 177th Street Branch or other CNB branches was counted by the Arthur Andersen auditors on January 14, 1988.
After counting the segregated cash, the staff auditors asked Cordova why he kept those funds in the locked cabinet. Cordova explained that a customer who had cashed a large certificate of deposit insisted on having the funds available on demand at all times. According to Cordova, the customer intended to use the funds to buy foreign currencies when market conditions became favorable. The volatility of the foreign currency market dictated that the customer have immediate access to the funds on a daily basis.

Near the completion of the 1987 CapitalBanc audit, Lukenda reviewed the workpaper that documented Cordova’s explanation for the \($2.7\) million of segregated cash. Lukenda then discussed that explanation with Curtin. After considering the matter, Curtin instructed Lukenda to have the staff auditors confirm that there was an offsetting liability to the given customer in CNB’s accounting records equal to the amount of the segregated funds. The staff auditors obtained the documentation for this liability directly from CNB personnel. This information was not confirmed with the customer or independently verified by the auditors in any other way. The staff auditors also did not obtain documentation confirming that the customer had cashed a large certificate of deposit. Finally, the staff auditors neglected to obtain any evidence to corroborate Cordova’s assertion regarding the customer’s planned use of the funds....... 

Questions 

1. When auditing cash, which of the management assertions discussed in SAS No. 106, “Audit Evidence,” are of primary concern to an auditor? Why?

2. Identify audit procedures that should be applied to cash funds maintained by a client on its business premises.

3. Identify mistakes or oversights made by Arthur Andersen personnel while auditing the cash funds at the 177th Street Branch.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: