In the 1980s, the Supreme Court ruled that it is legal for protesters to burn the American
Question:
In the 1980s, the Supreme Court ruled that it is legal for protesters to burn the American flag. This activity counts as free speech under the Constitution. If the Court hears a new flag burning case in this decade, should it consider changing its ruling, or should it follow precedent? Is following past precedent something that seems sensible to you: always, usually, sometimes, rarely, or never?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Business Law and the Legal Environment
ISBN: 978-1133587491
5th edition
Authors: Jeffrey F. Beatty, Susan S. Samuelson
Question Posted: