1. In most cases involving the interpretation and application of a contract, a party is not allowed...
Question:
1. In most cases involving the interpretation and application of a contract, a party is not allowed to present evidence outside the document expressing the parties’ agreement. Why not?
2. Suppose that under the law, a merger clause barred evidence of fraud in the inducement of a contract. How would this affect contract negotiations? Would the result in this case have been different? Discuss.
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Question Posted: