1. Scoville argued that Adpacks were not investment contracts because there was no guarantee that buyers would...

Question:

1. Scoville argued that Adpacks were not investment contracts because there was no guarantee that buyers would receive a return on their investment. Should the court have ruled in Scoville’s favor based on this argument? Explain.

2. The return on an investment in an Adpack was not based on any underlying business activity. Instead, money from new investors was used pay earlier investors. Is this a legitimate business model? Discuss.


Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  answer-question
Question Posted: