1. The trial court ruled that Wagner could have been an agent for the business. Why, in...

Question:

1. The trial court ruled that Wagner could have been an agent for “the business.” Why, in the view of the appellate court, did this ruling make no sense?

2. Suppose that instead of Wagner, Misenar had pursued the claim in the case against Port Orchard. Would the result have been different? Discuss.

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  answer-question
Question Posted: