The City of LaCrosse, Wisconsin, hired a contractor to install a new roof for an elementary school. The roof was purchased by the contractor from Kaiser Aluminum Sales Corporation (KASC). Shortly after the new roof was installed, it began to leak. The roof then fell apart, and a new roof was needed. The City sued KASC for breach of implied warranties. The court held in favor of KASC since the City lacked privity of contract and was suing for economic damages.

CASE QUESTIONS 1. Who would the City have to sue to recover damages?

2. Does this ruling make sense? Explain.