In experiments with standard solutions, (mathrm{a} mathrm{Li}^{+})ISE gave a calibration curve of [E=0.39+(0.0577) log left[mathrm{Li}^{+}ight]] An analyst

Question:

In experiments with standard solutions, \(\mathrm{a} \mathrm{Li}^{+}\)ISE gave a calibration curve of

\[E=0.39+(0.0577) \log \left[\mathrm{Li}^{+}ight]\]

An analyst assumed that the sensitivity of the ISE (represented by the coefficient of the log term) is the same in urine samples as it was in the standard solutions, but that differences in the activity coefficient and junction potential were too great to use the calibration curve to determine the \(\left[\mathrm{Li}^{+}ight]\)in urine samples. She decided to perform a standard additions experiment. Here are the data. Use a Gran plot of the data to determine the original \(\left[\mathrm{Li}^{+}ight]\)in the urine sample. Increments of \(0.0788 \mathrm{M}\) standard Li were added to \(50.0 \mathrm{~mL}\) of sample.

image text in transcribed

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Question Posted: