Repeat 7.6.1, assuming that updates to C incur a cache miss due to false sharing when consecutive

Question:

Repeat 7.6.1, assuming that updates to C incur a cache miss due to false sharing when consecutive elements are in a row (i.e., index i) are updated.

Exercise 7.6.1

Assume that we are going to compute C on both a single core shared memory machine and a 4-core shared-memory machine. Compute the
speedup we would expect to obtain on the 4-core machine, ignoring any memory issues.


Matrix multiplication plays an important role in a number of applications. Two matrices can only be multiplied if the number of columns of the first matrix is equal to the number of rows in the second.

Let’s assume we have an m × n matrix A and we want to multiply it by an n × p matrix B. We can express their product as an m × p matrix denoted by AB (or A · B). If we assign C = AB, and ci,j denotes the entry in C at position (i, j), thenij = W Tab=abyta r=1 i, 1,2 2,j  ... ta b inni,j

for each element i and j with 1 ≤  i m and 1 ≤ j p. Now we want to see if we can parallelize the computation of C. Assume that matrices are laid out in memory sequentially as follows: a1,1, a2,1, a3,1, a4,1, …, etc..

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  answer-question

Computer Organization And Design The Hardware Software Interface

ISBN: 9780123747501

4th Revised Edition

Authors: David A. Patterson, John L. Hennessy

Question Posted: