In 2004, Ford Motor Company entered into a dealership agreement with Syrian company Ghreiwati Auto, under which the company would sell and service Fords in Syria. Ghreiwati invested over $20 million setting up its dealer network across Syria and promoting the Ford brand. In 2011, President Obama issued an executive order setting forth a number of sanctions against Syria, including a prohibition against American companies selling products and services in Syria. Believing that the prohibition made its agreement with Ghreiwati illegal, Ford immediately terminated said contract. Ford filed a motion for a declaratory judgment stating that they had not terminated the contract improperly. How do you believe the court ruled in this case? Why? [Ford Motor Company v. Ghreiwati, 2013 U.S. District Court Lexis 159470 (2013).]