Some have argued that removing government controls that keep food prices down is a necessary step to ensure food security 28 In addition, some maintain, the subsequent increase in price will reduce soil erosion by giving farmers stronger incentives (and access to capital) to invest in long term ero...

1 Explanation of the Line of Reasoning Price Mechanism The argument is rooted in the economic principle that higher prices provide stronger incentives ...

Some have argued that removing government controls that keep food prices down is a necessary step to

Question:

Some have argued that removing government controls that keep food prices down is a necessary step to ensure food security.²⁸ In addition, some maintain, the subsequent increase in price will reduce soil erosion by giving farmers stronger incentives (and access to capital) to invest in long-term erosion control measures.
1. It seems counterintuitive to argue that increasing the price that consumers face for food will, in many cases, actually improve access to food. How can you explain this line of reasoning?
2. In the short run, who would suffer most from lifting price controls on food?
How can this problem be addressed?
3. Can you think of a reason why rising food prices might actually increase soil erosion?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!