The dissenting Justices in Obergefell claimed that the plaintiffs were not seeking to exercise the right to
Question:
The dissenting Justices in Obergefell claimed that the plaintiffs were not seeking to "exercise the right to marry," but were instead seeking to exercise a novel and nonexistent right to enter into something called a same-sex marriage; is this a valid critique of their claim and of the Supreme Court's response to it?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Answered By
JAPHETH KOGEI
Hi there. I'm here to assist you to score the highest marks on your assignments and homework. My areas of specialisation are:
Auditing, Financial Accounting, Macroeconomics, Monetary-economics, Business-administration, Advanced-accounting, Corporate Finance, Professional-accounting-ethics, Corporate governance, Financial-risk-analysis, Financial-budgeting, Corporate-social-responsibility, Statistics, Business management, logic, Critical thinking,
So, I look forward to helping you solve your academic problem.
I enjoy teaching and tutoring university and high school students. During my free time, I also read books on motivation, leadership, comedy, emotional intelligence, critical thinking, nature, human nature, innovation, persuasion, performance, negotiations, goals, power, time management, wealth, debates, sales, and finance. Additionally, I am a panellist on an FM radio program on Sunday mornings where we discuss current affairs.
I travel three times a year either to the USA, Europe and around Africa.
As a university student in the USA, I enjoyed interacting with people from different cultures and ethnic groups. Together with friends, we travelled widely in the USA and in Europe (UK, France, Denmark, Germany, Turkey, etc).
So, I look forward to tutoring you. I believe that it will be exciting to meet them.
2+ Reviews
10+ Question Solved
Related Book For 
Question Posted:
