Just for the sake of this exercise, imagine that the investigators wanted their statistical test to include the possibility that Buzz was a very sadistic dolphin, so malicious that he would willingly give up his own chance at a fish just to deprive Doris.
a. How would this thinking affect the p-value based on the actual data (15 right out of 16): Double it or cut it in half? (Explain your reasoning.)
b. Does this reframing of the alternative hypothesis make the evidence against the null hypothesis stronger or weaker?