Consider the following statement in predicate calculus: empty_class(C) X[takes(X; C)] (a) Translate this statement to clausal
Question:
Consider the following statement in predicate calculus:
empty_class(C) ← ¬∃X[takes(X; C)]
(a) Translate this statement to clausal form.
(b) Can you translate the statement into Prolog? Does it make a difference whether you’re allowed to use \+?
(c) How about the following:
takes everything(X) ∀C[takes(X; C)]
Can this be expressed in Prolog?
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Step by Step Answer:
Related Book For
Question Posted: