Consider the following statement in predicate calculus: empty_class(C) X[takes(X; C)] (a) Translate this statement to clausal

Question:

Consider the following statement in predicate calculus:

empty_class(C)  ← ¬∃X[takes(X; C)]

(a) Translate this statement to clausal form.

(b) Can you translate the statement into Prolog? Does it make a difference whether you’re allowed to use \+?

(c) How about the following:

takes everything(X)   ∀C[takes(X; C)]

Can this be expressed in Prolog?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Step by Step Answer:

Related Book For  book-img-for-question
Question Posted: