Fredrick works as a lab assistant in a large university. Part of his job is to prepare rocks for analysis- this is done by putting the rocks through two rollers that pulverize the rocks. The crushed rocks are then sent off in test tubes. Fredrick has worked in the job for 6 years and at the time of his employment was trained in how to use the machine, including being warned about the risks of finger damage. The machine is guarded by a Perspex (plastic) shield and affixed with two releasable catches. One day the machine is running poorly, Fredrick lifts the shield while it is still running and attempts to realign the rollers. His fingers get caught in the machine and he is hospitalized as a result.

With specific and detailed reference to the employer’s duty of care discuss whether or not you consider the employer would be liable for prosecution.

Summaries what activities this employer would need to undertake to escape prosecution

Consider the worker’s duty of care also? Has Fred breached the duty of care? What circumstances might make you consider that he might have breached the duty of care

Consider Fredrick was injured- what action can he take to receive compensation for his injuries?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

With particular and comprehensive reference to the employers duty of care discuss if or not you think the employer may be liable to prosecuted Through the nofault employee compensation system an injur... View the full answer