Microbiology Journal Article

1. Why did the scientists perform the study (i.e. description of background)?

2. What was the hypothesis (or hypotheses) under investigation?

3. What were the?major results and did they support or negate the hypothesis? Which key techniques were used to achieve these results?

4. Why are the results significant and do they point to further/future studies? In other words, why does this article matter and what should or could be done next?

5. Why did you choose this particular article to review? Was it interesting, informative, clearly written, or none of the above?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 Background of the study This study was evoked by the increasing cases of primary amoebic meningoencephalitis PAM in the recent past and lack of clear understanding on N fowleri the causative agent o... View the full answer