Write a criminal justice response to the following, if you agree or disagree, why or why not?

Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!

Question:

The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained through violation of the suspect's civil rights may be excluded from trial, as well as other evidence developed from the excluded evidence. I believe that the exclusionary rule should be amended especially in drug and murder cases. For instance, if el Chapo’s, the infamous Mexican drug lord, civil rights were violated, I would not lose a night’s sleep. Evil people, who admit that they are drug lords and criminals, and they is strong, undisputed evidence, should have no rights. What about the rights of the people that they have exploited and murder over the years. What rights should the Boston marathon bombers have? What rights do terrorists have? None as far as I am concerned The American criminal justice system is weak in certain areas and the exclusionary rule is one of them. The exclusionary rule should be amended to allow police officers to use any means necessary to take down terrorist and drug traffickers.