1. Find two current authoritative sources within the past 7 years that discuss approaches to treatment resistant anxiety in an adult client. In a Word document critically analyze these two approaches in no less than 3 paragraphs. Compare and contrast both sources and cite your sources, include the articles when you upload to the dropbox. Discuss similarities and differences, evaluate the quality of the evidence for each, and describe how you will use this in your future practice.

2. Compare using table comparing authoritative sources on the recommended treatment approaches to anxiety highlighting differences based on age: Child of 7yrs, Adolescent of 15 yrs and older adult of 70 yrs. Discuss a brief paragraph describing what you learned from this activity that you did not know about the differences in treating anxiety between the different age group

Transcribed Image Text:

constructed, legible, covers main concepts thoroughly. Graduate Level, Professional Writing 2 points Ideas are well constructed, written understandably and succinctly. Appropriate use/citation of sources. 1 point Ideas are overly simplistic lacking in depth, appear rushed or too wordy without substance. Sources are obscure or not current. A few noncritical errors in citations. O points Lacking in depth, difficult to read. O points Not attempted Points earned for timely submission Total 3 points Submitted no later than the posted due date/time O points Requested an extension for any reason. Syllabus Late Policy 5% point deduction for each day late as noted in the syllabus -1 point per day up to day 7 /2 O points O points /3 Submitted more than 7 days after due date. No credit can be earned. / 20 constructed, legible, covers main concepts thoroughly. Graduate Level, Professional Writing 2 points Ideas are well constructed, written understandably and succinctly. Appropriate use/citation of sources. 1 point Ideas are overly simplistic lacking in depth, appear rushed or too wordy without substance. Sources are obscure or not current. A few noncritical errors in citations. O points Lacking in depth, difficult to read. O points Not attempted Points earned for timely submission Total 3 points Submitted no later than the posted due date/time O points Requested an extension for any reason. Syllabus Late Policy 5% point deduction for each day late as noted in the syllabus -1 point per day up to day 7 /2 O points O points /3 Submitted more than 7 days after due date. No credit can be earned. / 20