1. In your opinion, which leadership approach (trait, situational, or transactional) more strongly justifies deviations from generally applicable moral requirements?

2. In business, particularly marketing, rule-breaking can be considered optimistic, providing a reward for morally questionable behavior. Explain this idea through the use of a real-world example. Is there justification for this type of behavior and would you be part of such? Why or why not?

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 The moral level of transactional leadership is never totally explicated and its connection to moral behavior is conflicting Nonetheless it is argued that cognitive moral development is amiable to th... View the full answer