2. Suppose Ford officials were asked to justify their decision. What moral principles do you think they
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
The Ford l'into THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THE "MADE IN JAPAN" label brought a predictable smirk of superiority to the face of most Americans. The quality of most Japanese products usually was as low as their price. In fact, few imports could match their domestic counterparts, the proud products of Yankee know-how. But by the late 1960s, an invasion of foreign-made goods chis- eled a few worry lines into the countenance of U.S. industry. In Detroit, worry was fast fading to panic as the Japanese, not to mention the Germans, began to gobble up more and more of the subcompact auto market. Never one to take a backseat to the competition, Ford Motor Company decided to meet the threat from abroad head-on. In 1968, Ford executives decided to produce the Pinto. Known inside the company as "Lee's car," after Ford president Lee lacocca, the Pinto was to weigh no more than 2,000 pounds and cost no more than $2,000.20 Eager to have its subcompact ready for the 1971 model year, Ford decided to compress the normal drafting-board-to- showroom time of about three-and-a-half years into two. The compressed schedule meant that any design changes typically made before production-line tooling would have to be made during it. Before producing the Pinto, Ford crash-tested various pro- totypes, in part to learn whether they met a safety standard proposed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to reduce fires from traffic collisions. This standard would have required that by 1972 all new autos be able to withstand a rear-end impact of 20 miles per hour without fuel loss and that by 1973 they be able to withstand an impact of 30 miles per hour. The prototypes all failed the 20-miles-per- hour test. In 1970, Ford crash-tested the Pinto itself, and the result was the same: ruptured gas tanks and dangerous leaks. The only Pintos to pass the test had been modified in some way for example, with a rubber bladder in the gas tank or a piece of steel between the tank and the rear bumper. Thus, Ford knew that the Pinto represented a serious fire hazard when struck from the rear, even in low-speed collisions. Ford officials faced a decision. Should they go ahead with the existing design, thereby meeting the produc- tion timetable but possibly jeopardizing consumer safety? Or should they delay production of the Pinto by redesigning the gas tank to make it safer and thus concede another year of subcompact dominance to foreign companies? Ford not only pushed ahead with the original design but also stuck to it for the next six years. What explains Ford's decision? The evidence suggests that Ford relied, at least in part, on cost-benefit reasoning, which is an analysis in monetary terms of the expected costs and benefits The Ford l'into THERE WAS A TIME WHEN THE "MADE IN JAPAN" label brought a predictable smirk of superiority to the face of most Americans. The quality of most Japanese products usually was as low as their price. In fact, few imports could match their domestic counterparts, the proud products of Yankee know-how. But by the late 1960s, an invasion of foreign-made goods chis- eled a few worry lines into the countenance of U.S. industry. In Detroit, worry was fast fading to panic as the Japanese, not to mention the Germans, began to gobble up more and more of the subcompact auto market. Never one to take a backseat to the competition, Ford Motor Company decided to meet the threat from abroad head-on. In 1968, Ford executives decided to produce the Pinto. Known inside the company as "Lee's car," after Ford president Lee lacocca, the Pinto was to weigh no more than 2,000 pounds and cost no more than $2,000.20 Eager to have its subcompact ready for the 1971 model year, Ford decided to compress the normal drafting-board-to- showroom time of about three-and-a-half years into two. The compressed schedule meant that any design changes typically made before production-line tooling would have to be made during it. Before producing the Pinto, Ford crash-tested various pro- totypes, in part to learn whether they met a safety standard proposed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to reduce fires from traffic collisions. This standard would have required that by 1972 all new autos be able to withstand a rear-end impact of 20 miles per hour without fuel loss and that by 1973 they be able to withstand an impact of 30 miles per hour. The prototypes all failed the 20-miles-per- hour test. In 1970, Ford crash-tested the Pinto itself, and the result was the same: ruptured gas tanks and dangerous leaks. The only Pintos to pass the test had been modified in some way for example, with a rubber bladder in the gas tank or a piece of steel between the tank and the rear bumper. Thus, Ford knew that the Pinto represented a serious fire hazard when struck from the rear, even in low-speed collisions. Ford officials faced a decision. Should they go ahead with the existing design, thereby meeting the produc- tion timetable but possibly jeopardizing consumer safety? Or should they delay production of the Pinto by redesigning the gas tank to make it safer and thus concede another year of subcompact dominance to foreign companies? Ford not only pushed ahead with the original design but also stuck to it for the next six years. What explains Ford's decision? The evidence suggests that Ford relied, at least in part, on cost-benefit reasoning, which is an analysis in monetary terms of the expected costs and benefits
Expert Answer:
Related Book For
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these psychology questions
-
Consider the joint effect of entry and exit barriers during periods of recession and of economic prosperity (consider four possible states (high/high, high/low; low/high; low/low). Identify four...
-
Safe Systems most recently reconciled its bank balance on April 30 and reported two checks outstanding at that time, No. 1771 for $781 and No. 1780 for $1,325.90. The following information is...
-
Draw the B.M and S.F. Diagrams for the beam loaded as shown in Fig 15.29.
-
Fawn Corporation, a C corporation, paid no dividends and recognized no capital gains or losses in the current year. What is its income tax liability assuming its taxable income for the year is a....
-
Who is the change agent in EAS?
-
A step-down transformer has a primary voltage of 240 V and a secondary voltage of 5 V. The primary current is 0.35 A. Determine the current in the secondary coil. A 160 MW power plant delivers a...
-
The force of air resistance on any object falling through the air increases with the object's speed. What happens to the acceleration of a raindrop as it falls from a cloud?
-
You drop a ball from some height. At which position do you expect its speed to be one-half the speed at which it cventually hits the ground: higher than the midpoint of the path, at the midpoint, or...
-
Thrust is the force that pushes a rocket forward. It is a force exerted on the rocket as the engine expels hot gases from the rear of the rocket. For most rockets, thrust is variable rather than...
-
Picture two objects, A and B, taking part in some interaction involving gauge particles. If object A radiates gauge particles uniformly in all directions, how does the strength of the interaction...
-
A worker pushes a box in a factory. In each case, decide which force has the greater magnitude: the force exerted by the worker on the box or the force exerted by the box on the worker. (a) The box...
-
Given that the consumer decision process helps marketers understand emotion, environment, and attribute based decisions, demonstrate a thorough understanding of the process.
-
You are the newly appointed tax practitioner to complete Emilys tax return and have downloaded the prefill report for Emilys tax return (hint, you can read what a prefill report is here (Links to an...
-
An article in the New York Times in early 2009 stated that even though The the U.S. economy was in a recession, and movie ticket sales had increased by 17.5 percent. In contrast, during 2020, ticket...
-
In 2023, an article in the Financial Times quoted Michael Hicks, an economics professor at Indianas Ball State University, as saying that RVs are a classic disposable income and interest rate...
-
Go to the Hubbard OBrien Economics Blog and read the following post titled, How the Effects of the Covid-19 Recession Differed Across Business Sectors and Income Groups,...
Mastering Money A Guide To Personal Finance And Budgeting 1st Edition - ISBN: B0BW3418ZB - Free Book
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App