A ceramic manufacturer promised to deliver 25 crates of vases to a Japanese importer under a "CFR" INTERCOM agreement. During transit, however, a large number of vases were broken. The buyer wants to pay the manufacturer only for the ceramic vases which arrived in a good condition saying that the manufacturer is responsible for the shipment and paying for the freight charges. Is the importer right in his/her claim? Assess the situation and justify your answer.