A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $51 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $17 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $18 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 13%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: | % Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: 3.31 million b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated? I. The environmental effects if not mitigated could result in additional loss of cash flows and/or fines and penalties due to ill will among customers, community, etc. Therefore, even though the mine is legal without mitigation, the company needs to make sure that they have anticipated all costs in the "no mitigation" analysis from not doing the environmental mitigation. -Select- v % II. The environmental effects should be ignored since the mine is legal without mitigation. III. The environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. million IV. The environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. Therefore, since the mine is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis. V. The environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. -Select- c. Should this project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do the mitigation? I. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its IRR without mitigation is greater than its IRR when mitigation costs are included in the analysis. II. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its NPV with mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. III. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its NPV without mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are included in the analysis. -Select- IV. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its IRR with mitigation is greater than its IRR when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. V. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its NPV with mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $51 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $17 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $18 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 13%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: | % Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: 3.31 million b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated? I. The environmental effects if not mitigated could result in additional loss of cash flows and/or fines and penalties due to ill will among customers, community, etc. Therefore, even though the mine is legal without mitigation, the company needs to make sure that they have anticipated all costs in the "no mitigation" analysis from not doing the environmental mitigation. -Select- v % II. The environmental effects should be ignored since the mine is legal without mitigation. III. The environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. million IV. The environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. Therefore, since the mine is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis. V. The environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. -Select- c. Should this project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do the mitigation? I. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its IRR without mitigation is greater than its IRR when mitigation costs are included in the analysis. II. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its NPV with mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. III. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its NPV without mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are included in the analysis. -Select- IV. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its IRR with mitigation is greater than its IRR when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis. V. Under the assumption that all costs have been considered, the company would not mitigate for the environmental impact of the project since its NPV with mitigation is greater than its NPV when mitigation costs are not included in the analysis.
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
a To calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation we need to discount the cash inflows using the riskadjusted WACC Weighted Average Cost of Capital of 13 ... View the full answer
Related Book For
Fundamentals of Financial Management
ISBN: 978-0324664553
Concise 6th Edition
Authors: Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these finance questions
-
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an...
-
An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the...
-
Managing Scope Changes Case Study Scope changes on a project can occur regardless of how well the project is planned or executed. Scope changes can be the result of something that was omitted during...
-
Day and Night formed an accounting partnership in 2014. Capital transactions for Day and Night during 2014 are as follows: Partnership net income for the year ended December 31, 2014; is $68,400...
-
Due to the presence everywhere of the cosmic background radiation, the minimum possible temperature of a gas in interstellar or intergalactic space is not 0 K but 2.7 K. This implies that a...
-
If the 3-in.-diameter short rod is made from brittle material having an ultimate strength of \(\sigma_{\text {ult }}=60 \mathrm{ksi}\), for both tension and compression, determine if the shaft fails...
-
For testing H0 : 1 = 2 versus H1: 1 2, we observe s1 = 9.3, s2 = 2.1, n1 = 6, and n2 = 13. Test at the significance level = 0.05. a. Find the critical value. b. Do you reject H0?
-
Wine Accessories Inc. (WAI) produces two models of corkscrews, the standard model and a deluxe model.WAI follows a level aggregate plan, producing 20,000 corkscrews per month, or 5000 corkscrews per...
-
What innovative methodologies can leaders employ to cultivate a diverse and inclusive workforce, thereby capitalizing on the manifold perspectives and experiences to foster creativity and drive...
-
The trial balance of Pacilio Security Services Inc. as of January 1, 2017, had the following normal balances: Cash ................. 78 , 972 P e t t y C a s h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 A c...
-
Suppose we have the following declarations: int a, *p; How can we make p point to a? Select one: O O P = &a; *p &p O &a; *a; *a;'
-
When can a partial dependency exist in a database? If yes, example please
-
Given the arrangement of charged particles in the figure below, find the net electrostatic force on the q = 5.35-C charged particle. (Assume 92 = 12.33 C and 93 = -19.12 C. Express your answer in...
-
is this cite correct Staff, About Amazon. "How Your Package Gets from Amazon's Warehouse to Your Front Door."USAbout Amazon, 24 July 2019,...
-
Research golf course lawsuits. Find a lawsuit, read about the lawsuit and share the information on the lawsuit with your classmates. Provide a thorough summary of the lawsuit and discuss how it might...
-
You are a homeowner with a swimming pool in your backyard. You share a fence with the neighbor behind you. While you went on vacation, your neighbor's seven year old came through a hole in the fence...
-
On January 1, 2024, Parker Inc. purchased $100,000 of Amy Company bonds at a discount of $5,000. The Amy bonds pay 6% interest but were purchased when the market interest rate was 7% for bonds of...
-
The value of a share of common stock depends on the cash flows it is expected to provide, and those flows consist of the dividends the investor receives each year while holding the stock and the...
-
a. Given the following graphs, calculate the total fixed costs, variable costs per unit, and sales price for Firm A. Firm Bs fixed costs are $120,000, its variable costs per unit are $4, and its...
-
Stock A has an expected return of 7%, a standard deviation of expected returns of 35%, a correlation coefficient with the market of 0.3, and a beta coefficient of !0.5. Stock B has an expected...
-
At the end of last year, Roberts Inc. reported the following income statement (in millions of dollars): Sales $3,000 Operating costs excluding depreciation 2,450 EBITDA $ 550 Depreciation 250 EBIT $...
-
Answer the following questions for the cited articles of the Principles of Professional Conduct. a. Responsibilities (Article 1). To which three groups do CPAs have responsibilities? b. The Public...
-
What is the difference between the two following sec- tions of the Rules of Professional Conduct? a. Interpretations of the Rules. b. Ethics Rulings.
-
Describe the purpose of each of the following Rules of Professional Conduct. a. 101-Independence. b. 102-Integrity and Objectivity. c. 201-General Standards. d. 202-Compliance with Standards. e....
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App