A person develops pain in their joints and feet as well as loss of control of her eye muscles after taking a prescription for allergies. The side effects are not ones that are listed on the enclosure that comes with the medication. The manufacturer of the allergy medication claims that it was unaware of the possibility of these types of symptoms. Should this person be able to sue the manufacturer for damages? 

What are the differences between public and private necessity and give an example for each? Are there situations where such actions can be abused?

Only if asked by a tenant does California law requires that a landlord tell that prospective tenant if anyone has died on the premises in the past three years. In your opinion, does this law violate the duties of a landlord to the tenant?

 

Answer rating: 100% (QA)

1 Whether the person can sue the manufacturer for damages depends on a number of factors including the laws of the state where the person lives the specific facts of the case and the evidence that is ... View the full answer