A well-known example of Simpson's Paradox, published by Bickel, Hammel, and O'Connell, examined admission rates for men
Question:
A well-known example of Simpson's Paradox, published by Bickel, Hammel, and O'Connell, examined admission rates for men and women who had applied to graduate programs at the University of California at Berkeley. The actual breakdown of data for specific programs is confidential, but the point can be made with similar, hypothetical numbers. For simplicity, we will assume there are only two graduate programs. The figures for acceptance to each program are shown in the table.
An example of Simpson's Paradox
Program A | Program B | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Admit | Deny | Total | Admit | Deny | Total | |
Men | 300 | 335 | 635 | 65 | 300 | 365 |
Women | 40 | 25 | 65 | 135 | 300 | 435 |
Total | 340 | 360 | 700 | 200 | 600 | 800 |
(a)Combine the data for the two programs into one aggregate table. What percentage of all men who applied were admitted? What percentage of all women who applied were admitted?
Admit | Deny | Total | Percent Admitted | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Men | % | |||
Women | % | |||
Total |
b)
What percentage of the men who applied did Program A admit?
men %
What percentage of the women who applied did Program A admit? (Round your answer to one decimal place.
women %
c)
What percentage of the men who applied did Program B admit?
men %
What percentage of the women who applied did Program B admit? (Round your answer to one decimal place.)
women %